Legislature(1999 - 2000)
05/11/1999 05:35 PM Senate FIN
Audio | Topic |
---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 112(HES) "An Act relating to a program of postsecondary education for high school students." This was the first hearing for this bill in the Senate Finance Committee. Senator KIM ELTON, sponsor, testified that the bill would give high school students and families new academic options at no cost. The bill was termed "The Running Start Education Program". In this program, 11th and 12th grade high school students will get dual credit for courses taken at a publicly funded Alaska college or vocational school. These credits would apply toward both the high school and college (or vocational school) graduation requirements. The tuition fees would be paid by the student's home school district. Senator Kim Elton suggested that this concept is not unusual; twenty other jurisdictions had similar programs and SB 112 is based on a Washington State program. He noted that other states require the families pay the tuition costs rather than the school districts. Senator Kim Elton testified to the benefits of the Running Start Program. The program would expand course options beyond what is available at the participating student's high school. He stressed that this was especially valuable for gifted and talented students. Senator Kim Elton added that the program would also provide opportunities to enroll in technical courses, which is good for those students not on the academic tract. The technical courses could help get those students ready to enter the work world. Senator Kim Elton pointed out the 2.75 grade point average eligibility requirement for the program, and indicated that there is a provision allowing school administrators to waive the stipulation for certain students. The waiver is important to allow some students, who are not planning to pursue a college degree, to obtain vocational training. He also noted that the participants would have to be students "in good standing" at the school district where they are enrolled. Senator Kim Elton explained that the participating students would be responsible for applying and gaining acceptance into a college or vocational school. The student and the student's family would decide which courses to take. He commented that in other states with similar programs, participating students usually took two or three courses. Senator Kim Elton explained that in the program proposed in SB 112, once the student successfully completed the college or vocational technical school course, the student would receive both college and high school credit. The amount of the high school credit awarded to the student would be determined by the high school administration. The student's high school would submit the tuition and lab fees to the college or vocational school. The student would pay for books and supplies and retain ownership. Senator Kim Elton disclosed that students who were enrolled full-time in high school would not be provided tuition reimbursement for college or vocational courses under this bill. Senator Kim Elton noted that the fiscal note was not based on any cost or result from this bill. He remarked that the fiscal note reflects the possibility that some high school students would purposely fail the graduation exit exam in order to remain a high school student and continue earning college credits at the school district's expense. He believed that scenario was only a remote possibility because of the bill's provision that the program is only available to students in good standing and because the school district could make that good standing determination. He surmised that a school district could find that a student who fails the exit exam is not in good standing. He suggested someone from the Department of Education could speak more directly to the fiscal note. Senator Gary Wilken referred to AS 14.30.780(a), page 3 line 6 of the committee substitute that prohibited school districts from paying postsecondary course costs for full- time secondary school students. He wanted to know how the sponsor defined "full-time secondary student" and suggested the Committee incorporate a definition into the language of the bill. Senator Kim Elton answered that a full-time secondary student is a student who attends high school for a "normal school day". He stressed that it was important to let the school district define full-time secondary student, since each school district operated under different circumstances. In answering Senator Gary Wilken's next question, Senator Kim Elton said correspondence students qualify as full-time students if the correspondence program is provided by a school district within the state. Co-Chair John Torgerson asked if the educational funding allocation for a participating student would be granted to the college or vocational school where the student was taking courses rather than to the school district. Senator Kim Elton explained that the school district would pay for courses taken by the part-time high school students of that district. Tuition costs average $73 per credit hour. Senator Kim Elton noted that the participating post- secondary schools must be publicly funded. A private flying school does not qualify. He also stressed that participating students must meet the requirements of the college or vocational school they wish to attend. Co-Chair John Torgerson asked if the adoption of this bill would require school districts to transport students to postsecondary classes. He referred to special education programs that require school districts to provide additional transportation. Senator Kim Elton said the bill specifically dictates that the student is responsible for transportation plus any extra fees involved in the postsecondary courses. Co-Chair John Torgerson asked about the impact the Running Start Program would have on the TEK PREP program in his district that actively solicits high school students to take college courses for secondary school credit. Senator Kim Elton replied that language had been added to SB 112 specifying that nothing in the bill would prohibit school districts and postsecondary institutions from entering into arrangements similar to the Kenai Peninsula program. He said he was continuing to work with school districts to ensure the bill does not preclude school districts' innovative programs. Senator Randy Phillips remarked that the Anchorage School District felt this program was an unfunded mandate. As Co-Chair John Torgerson understood, the intent of the bill is to use a part of the per-student formula funds that presumably would be leftover since the student does not attend the secondary school on a full-time basis and therefore incur the full cost to educate. He did not agree that SB 112 is an unfunded mandate. Senator Kim Elton agreed with the co-chair. He pointed out that there are some students who do not attend any classes at the high school and yet the school district receives full funding for those students. He said that an argument could be made that the post-secondary campus should receive all of the funds if that is were the student attends classes. However, many of these students still receive school district support by way of counseling and other services and are eligible to participate in extracurricular activities and the district should be compensated. Senator Kim Elton stated that "there was no net loss to education under this program." He explained that the funds would not be removed from the education component, simply shifted from a secondary to a postsecondary level of education. Co-Chair John Torgerson asked if there were limitations on the types of post secondary courses that would qualify for the program. He gave an example of a pottery class and wanted to know if graduation credits would be given for those types of classes. Senator Kim Elton answered that was possible but noted that the high school would have the authority to determine credit allocations for courses. Senator Kim Elton stated that this bill would allow a student in good standing to take a course at a university that was also offered at the high school, such as French I. This would allow the student to obtain college credit as well as high school graduation credit. He surmised that a student could fulfill the requirements of their first year in college before graduating from high school. He spoke of the financial benefits this would have to families. Senator Dave Donley relayed how during his senior year at Diamond High School, he took university courses in lieu of high school courses. He worked a summer job to pay for the post secondary courses, and didn't expect anyone else to pay for them. He supported this on-going program of allowing dual credit. However, this bill expects the school district to pay the tuition, which he disagreed with and he believed that the individual student should be responsible for the cost. He noted that the Anchorage school district opposed the bill and he felt it places a burden on the district. Senator Dave Donley argued that the costs to school districts would not go down because the courses would still need to be maintained for those who might fail a university class and return to the high school for that class. The school district could not anticipate the need for the classes and would have to continue providing them. He stressed that it was the student's right to take the high school class. He also noted that there would still be expenses to the high school for services provided to the students. Senator Lyda Green referred to language on page 3 line 2 of the committee substitute that stipulated that the post secondary school cannot charge a fee for the award of college credit when high school credit is also granted. Senator Kim Elton explained that this was a simple provision to prohibit a double charge to both the school district and the student. EDDY JEANS, Manager, School Finance Section, Education Support Services, Department of Education told the Committee that the department had already testified in support of the concept. Eddy Jeans said he was present to discuss the fiscal note. The indeterminate amount notation was due to language on page 2 line 18 of the committee substitute that stipulated that a student who completed the course requirement for high school graduation but had not yet received a diploma can participate in the Running Start program. Students who do not pass the high school graduation qualification exam will be permitted to continue in the public school system up until the age of twenty, with the normal graduation age being eighteen. Under this provision, a student who intentionally fails the exam could exploit the program for up to two years of college courses. Senator Lyda Green suggested a stipulation requiring that a student who failed the exam and had a grade point average that was above a certain level shall be eliminated from the program. She stated that she did not support the bill, but thought this might be a way to avoid the potential exploitation reflected in the fiscal note. Eddy Jeans responded that a student could have a 4.0 grade point average and still fail the graduation exam. Co-Chair John Torgerson didn't have any correspondence from school districts relating to the bill and wanted to know if the department had received feedback. Eddy Jeans replied that the department had not. Senator Randy Phillips knew that the Anchorage School District opposed the bill. Senator Dave Donley asked if the department actively solicited input from local school districts on this legislation. Eddy Jeans answered that the department had not. Senator Dave Donley expounded on his opinions of the Department of Education. He thought that before the department voiced support of the concept of the bill, it should have consulted with local school districts. Co-Chair John Torgerson ordered the bill held in committee.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|